However, the comparative assessment in 15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply. If the contracting officer elects to consider past performance as an evaluation factor, it shall be evaluated in accordance with 15.305. If the contracting officer documents the file pursuant to 15.304(c)(3)(iii), past performance need not be an evaluation factor in lowest price technically acceptable source selections. Solicitations shall specify that award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. (1) The evaluation factors and significant subfactors that establish the requirements of acceptability shall be set forth in the solicitation. (b) When using the lowest price technically acceptable process, the following apply: (a) The lowest price technically acceptable source selection process is appropriate when best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price. 15.101-2 Lowest price technically acceptable source selection process. ![]() The perceived benefits of the higher priced proposal shall merit the additional cost, and the rationale for tradeoffs must be documented in the file in accordance with 15.406. (c) This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal. (2) The solicitation shall state whether all evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than, approximately equal to, or significantly less important than cost or price. (1) All evaluation factors and significant subfactors that will affect contract award and their relative importance shall be clearly stated in the solicitation and (b) When using a tradeoff process, the following apply: This project is directly connected to her long-term research goal of developing a pragmatist epistemology centred around framing inquiry.Ĭheck out her personal website to learn more about Céline’s work.(a) A tradeoff process is appropriate when it may be in the best interest of the Government to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror. It involves an account of what is engineered, primarily based on Robert Brandom’s inferentialism an account of how we engineer concepts, based on John Dewey’s theory of inquiry and her own account of “framing inquiry” and the use of this pragmatist framework in order to solve several problems in the field. Her current postdoctoral project, under the supervision of Cheryl Misak, consists in developing a comprehensive pragmatist framework for conceptual engineering, which will serve as an alternative to existing frameworks. She argues that Dewey’s most original (and controversial) insights should be understood in the context of framing inquiry, while traditional realist notions of knowledge, existence, and truth should be understood in the context of framed inquiry. ![]() She defends Dewey’s theory of inquiry by drawing a distinction between what she calls “framed inquiry”, in which inquirers ask and answer questions by relying on a settled conceptual framework, and “framing inquiry”, in which inquirers develop, revise, or create a conceptual framework. In her dissertation, titled “Framed and Framing Inquiry: Development and Defence of John Dewey’s Theory of Knowledge,” she provides a novel perspective on what realists consider to be Dewey’s most controversial claims regarding knowledge, its object, and truth. ![]() MA, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Paris and Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences SocialesĬéline completed her PhD at the University of Cambridge under the supervision of Hasok Chang and Huw Price.BA, University of Lyon and Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |